Yesterday on the Broncos-Cowboys telecast, Troy Aikman said one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard. He said that when he observed Broncos wide receiver Brandon Marshall at practice, he worked harder than any wide receiver he’s ever seen at a practice except for Michael Irvin. I highly doubt that. First, it’s not possible to work harder than giving 100 percent effort, so it would probably be a tie between about a thousand receivers as to who worked the hardest at a practice. I also find the idea of Irvin working harder than any other receiver kind of ridiculous. However, if there was a receiver who worked harder than anyone else it would be Art Monk, who by the way had more catches, yards, and touchdowns than Irvin and did it without a Hall of Fame QB.
Dumb Comment
October 5, 2009My Favorite Websites
October 5, 2009Books on Tape and CD
October 5, 2009You have to love books on tape. These days, people often don’t have the time or attention span to sit through reading an entire book, but they do sometimes have long commutes to work. The same old radio stations get boring because they play the same songs over and over. News stations are no better because they’re often too slanted politically. Books on tape can be a great solution. I have tons of them on CD and cassette for sale, plus a lot of regular books. You can see them at www.amazon.com/shops/mikeneedsakidney.com. My prices are among the lowest on amazon. Some of the books are as low as $4.50.
Cleveland Clowns Fans
September 29, 2009Are Cleveland Browns fans smart enough to deserve a winning football team?
In 2005, the fan base clamored for a rookie, local product Charlie Frye to start over Trent Dilfer, who had won a Super Bowl. Frye went on to go 6-13 with the Browns and he is now on his third team, the Raiders, and won’t likely see the field.
Once again, most Browns fans wanted the local player this year, Brady Quinn, over the better player, Derek Anderson. Anderson was 10-5 as a starter in 2007, but the Browns went with the heralded unproven Quinn who is 0-3 so far this year. He makes more money, so he must be better, right?
This forlorn franchise should stop listening to its fans and let players earn their positions instead.
Ohio Wesleyan University Transcript: 20 Years Later
September 27, 2009I went back to the archives to pull out an article I wrote 20 years ago as the Sports Editor of the Transcript, the Ohio Wesleyan University student newspaper, the oldest independent student newspaper in the nation.
The article below was about an eventful soccer game, and after the paper came out, the OWU coach told me he appreciated the fact that I didn’t make the brawl the main focus of the game.
Here is the article, from 20 years ago. The paragraphs seem short because the paper had columns that were about 1.5 inches wide.
Men’s Soccer Team Wins Brawl-Marred Game
By Mike Frandsen, Sports Editor
Charlie Blanchard scored a goal in the opening minutes of each half to lead the Ohio Wesleyan men’s soccer team to a 2-1 victory over Oakland (Michigan) in a physical battle Friday at Roy Rike Field.
“This was our best win of the year,” said Bishops coach Jay Martin.
Blanchard also scored a goal in a 2-1 loss at Wilmington Tuesday.
Bishops Still No. 1 in Nation
Oakland, last year’s Division II runner-up, came into the game off a win over Division I Cleveland State.
The Bishops, ranked No. 1 in the nation in Division III, improved their record to 14-3.
“They have a good team,” said Pioneer coach Gary Parsons. “They played a good, high-pressure game.”
The game was marred by a bench-clearing brawl with just over a minute left in the game. Blanchard and Domenic Romanelli of Ohio Wesleyan and Alan Stewart of Oakland were each issued red cards. A red card is an automatic one-game suspension.
Blanchard Scores Two
Blanchard scored just four minutes into the game on a penalty kick after teammate Bob Barnes was tripped by an Oakland defender in the penalty box.
The rest of the half went back and forth with each team having chances to score.
Ohio Wesleyan went into the locker room at halftime with a 1-0 lead.
Blanchard scored another quick goal to open the second half, this time less than two minutes after the intermission. Romanelli assisted on Blanchard’s 18th goal of the year. With 20 minutes left in the game Earl Parris had a breakaway for Oakland. Bishop defender Basil Levy tripped Parris and was called for a foul.
Kaplan guessed wrong on the penalty kick and broke to his right as John Stewart put the ball in the other side of the net.
Oakland’s best chance to tie the game came two minutes later when Paul Phillips outran two Bishop defenders. But Kaplan grabbed the ball and made one of his 11 saves for the game.
Bench Clearing Brawl
The bench-clearing brawl occurred with 1:25 remaining in the contest.
Romanelli was dribbling the ball in Oakland territory in front of the Bishop bench. Alan Stewart of the Pioneers kicked Romanelli in the leg right after Romanelli kicked the ball away. Romanelli turned around and shoved Stewart, and Stewart shoved Romanelli back.
Then, all hell broke loose.
Several Ohio Wesleyan players left the bench and ran after Stewart. Immediately, every player on both teams ran from the field or the bench and an all-out brawl ensued. Martin tried to break up the fight as did the referees but the melee lasted for several minutes.
At least five different fights were in progress at the same time near the sideline.
Coaches Upset
Parsons was furious after the game. “I don’t approve of the fact that their (Ohio Wesleyan’s) bench unloaded on a player on the field. That is not a class act.”
Martin agreed. “I am mad about it too. It was 100 percent wrong.”
Blanchard said, “They just went out to protect Domenic.”
Bishop midfielder Eric Warn said Martin had mixed emotions in the locker room after the game.
“He said he feels great and at the same time feels terrible because we came together as a team but the fight is not something he likes to happen,” Warn said.
Referees Criticized
Parsons said the referees let the game get out of hand by not calling enough fouls on both teams.
“The referees allowed the players to foul from behind,” he said. Parsons said most of the non-calls should have gone against the Bishops.
Martin pointed out that the referees called 19 fouls against the Bishops and only eight against the Pioneers. Martin added that the referees did lose control of the game.
Martin said that the Oakland game, which followed a 2-1 loss to Wilmington Tuesday, might have been a turning point for the Bishops.
“If we didn’t play well we would have been in trouble the rest of the season,” Martin said.
Ohio Wesleyan will end its NCAC schedule against Denison Saturday in Granville.
Martin said the Bishops need to beat either Kenyon or Denison to receive an NCAA tournament bid.
Songs
September 27, 2009Here is a sampling of songs I heard on Sirius Satellite Radio the first week of September as I started a new venture. Great for inspiration. There is something about hearing a song on the radio that is better than hearing it on a CD, etc., because of the spontaneity of it. Here they are in order starting with the best.
- The Waiting by Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers*
- Killing Moon by Echo and the Bunnymen
- Long December by Counting Crows
- Rapper’s Delight by Sugar Hill Gang
- Jumper by Third Eye Blind
- Where the Streets Have No Name by U2
- Eyes without a Face by Billy Idol
- Back for More by Ratt
- Seek and Destroy by Metallica
*This has to be one of the greatest songs of all time. The video is very plain – it was the very early days of music videos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLCJEYLIBQY
Bernard Rimland and Autism
September 27, 2009Sometimes I buy used books and resell them at http://www.amazon.com/shops/mikeneedsakidneydotcom.
The other day I bought an interesting book: “Infantile Autism: The Syndrome and Its Implication for a Neural Theory of Behavior,” written by Bernard Rimland and published in 1964. Someone bought it as soon as I put it on amazon, so I just had a chance to briefly skim through it.
Rimland was one of the first researchers to state that autism was a neurological disorder. He also founded the Autism Research Institute and the Autism Society of America. Rimland was one of the first researchers to advocate biomedical treatments that have improved the symptoms of countless children and adults with autism. He also served as the chief technical advisor on the movie “Rain Man.”
According to Wikipedia, Rimland’s book “is credited by many with changing the prevailing view of autism, in the field of psychiatry, from an emotional illness -widely thought to be caused by refrigerator mothers – to the current recognition that autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder.”
I picked out a few interesting quotes from the book.
“Many writers consider the child’s hostility or indifference to his parents as evidence that the parents are guilty of causing the disease…It would seem more reasonable to regard the child’s actions as ‘symptoms,’ not as symptoms of etiology. In the case of the adult who insists that he is being persecuted by the Communists, one does not take his statements at face value but only as an indication that he is ill.”
So Rimland was saying that doctors who blamed parents for their children’s autism were wrong, just as those who blamed parents for their children’s mental illnesses were wrong. Believe it or not, as recently as the 1970s much of the medical establishment believed that autism as well as mental illnesses were the result of the coldness of the mother, which obviously is anything but the case. But it wasn’t until the late 1970s that this view was debunked, so Rimland, writing in the early 1960s, was ahead of his time.
It makes you wonder what else the medical establishment is wrong about, and it goes to show that you shouldn’t just blindly follow it. If you’re a parent of a child with autism now, imagine how bad it must have been back then if doctors had told you that your child’s autism was your fault.
Another quote from the book talked about how rare autism was at the time: “The extreme rarity of the disease is attested to by the fact that Kanner himself who is reported to have seen over 20,000 disturbed children in his more than thirty years of psychiatric practice, had by 1958 seen fewer than 150 cases of early infantile autism. This includes children brought to him for diagnosis from all parts of the world.”
We know now, 45 years after the publication of this book, that there is an autism epidemic that is attributable to much more than an expansion of the diagnostic criteria. I myself have met hundreds of children with severe autism in the Washington, DC area, and I’m sure I’ve only met a tiny fraction of all the kids with severe autism in this area. According to the Centers for Disease Control, 1 in 150 children has an Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Finally, Rimland said, “Most writers regard the children as quite agile and graceful…the children who do use their hands are remarkably dexterous.” He describes their “fast and graceful movements” and “excellent motor coordination.” In fact, a majority of children with autism now have very poor motor skills and coordination, so that shows that at least in this respect the disorder has worsened, and some type of trigger has resulted in children with autism having worse motor skills than before.
Greenspan’s DIR Model for Autism: Part 1
September 20, 2009For therapists and families to be effective in working with kids with autism, they should be able to do any methodology.
There is an alphabet soup of different methods to teach kids with autism – Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA); the Developmental, Individual Differences, Relationship-Based (DIR) Model; Relationship Development Intervention (RDI); Treatment and Education of Autistic and Communication – Handicapped Children (TEACCH), and others.
Regardless of which methodologies are used, programs need to have goals and targets and teach in such a way so that kids can generalize skills to apply what they have learned to a natural environment. Teaching methods should also integrate academics and cognitive skills; emotional awareness and social skills; exercise, sports, and motor skills; along with spontaneous, imaginative, and creative play. Skills should be taught in a meaningful way rather than a robotic, rote way.
Children need to develop a relationship with caregivers in order to learn. The revolving door philosophy of bringing people in and out so that a child has had 100 caregivers by the time he is 10 does not work. Stanley Greenspan says, “Emotion always come before behavior. The child needs to enjoy relationships with parents, peers, and teachers in order to learn.” Emotion is critical to brain development. It’s more than “cute” when a child is engaged with a caregiver. The child learns better.
I have been an advocate of Greenspan’s DIR method for the past few years. The Interdisciplinary Council on Learning Disorders (www.icdl.com) says this about DIR.
DIR is a comprehensive, interdisciplinary approach that focuses on the emotional development of the child. It takes into account the child’s feelings, relationships with caregivers, developmental level and individual differences in a child’s ability to process and respond to sensory information. It focuses on the child’s skills in all developmental areas, including social-emotional functioning, communication, thinking and learning, motor skills, body awareness, and attention.
The goal of treatment is to help the child master the healthy emotional milestones that were missed in his early development and that are critical to learning. Building these foundations helps children overcome their symptoms more effectively than simply trying to change the symptoms alone.
Then it says this about Floortime:
Floortime, a vital element of the DIR/Floortime model, is a treatment method as well as a philosophy for interacting with children (and adults as well). Floortime involves meeting a child at his current developmental level, and building upon his particular set of strengths. Floortime harnesses the power of a child’s motivation; following his lead, wooing him with warm but persistent attempts to engage his attention and tuning in to his interests and desires in interactions. Through Floortime, parents, child care providers, teachers and therapists help children climb the developmental ladder. By entering into a child’s world, we can help him or her learn to relate in meaningful, spontaneous, flexible and warm ways.
Floortime is a component of DIR but not the same. In Floortime, you follow the lead of the child. In DIR, once kids move past the initial stages of the developmental ladder, you create programs that revolve around the child’s interests, in which he is emotionally engaged, with meaningful two-way interaction, customized toward his individual differences. The kids don’t tell you what to do; you just do things that are meaningful to them. Again, Floortime is only a subset of DIR. In the lower developmental levels of DIR (Floortime), you follow the child’s lead (but even then that means you follow and join what the child is interested in – the child doesn’t tell you what to do), and in the higher levels there are more structured, therapist or parent-led programs.
Two and a half years ago, I wrote on my website at http://www.coachmike.net/autism-faq.php (see #4) a little about DIR and Floortime, as well as a summary of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).
I combine elements of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) as well as the Developmental, Individual-Difference, Relationship (DIR) based method. I believe a combination of ABA and DIR methods is optimal because ABA provides step-by-step instruction while DIR focuses on relationships, emotions and interests. Children need both structure and meaning when they learn.
ABA is used to teach academic, communication, problem solving, behavioral, social, play, and other skills by breaking tasks down into small steps and practicing drills. ABA also uses positive reinforcement and just as much prompting as is necessary. Inappropriate behaviors may be phased out by redirecting to target activities rather than drawing more attention to those behaviors. Antecedents, behaviors, and consequences are tracked to try to determine the reasons behind behaviors and implement appropriate interventions. However, some behaviors may be accommodations children need to manage their body or sensory difficulties. Therefore, I focus on building skills more so than reducing behaviors.
The DIR method focuses on the emotional development of the child. It takes into account the child’s feelings, relationships and individual differences. DIR involves following the child’s lead and enables the child to learn by doing what he or she likes to do in a fun and meaningful way. According to ICDL.org, “DIR focuses on the child’s skills in all developmental areas, including social-emotional functioning, communication, thinking and learning, motor skills, body awareness and attention.” The DIR method can also help a child generalize skills initially learned through drills.
Part of the DIR model includes Floortime, which is based on working with a child at his or her current developmental level, and building upon strengths and interests in a way that is meaningful to the child, rather than just focusing on surface behaviors and drills that don’t always generalize into life skills. Floortime can be especially effective during periods when a child needs more play and less work.
5. Which is better – ABA or the DIR model?
In my opinion, this question is kind of like asking, “Which is better in football – running the ball or passing the ball?” or “Which is better in basketball – a zone defense or man to man?” They’re both necessary in different situations, and a balance of both may be most effective. For example, you can do repetitive drills broken down into small steps based on the child’s individual differences, interests and relationships, making sure to incorporate social skills and emotions.
In doing so, children can learn valuable skills such as sequencing the steps needed to complete a task. Children with autism benefit from structure, but they will be more engaged if the drill involves something in which they are emotionally invested. The DIR model is harder to quantify than ABA, but DIR is built on relationships, spontaneity and interaction. Children are not robots, and drills can’t be done in a vacuum.
For example, you can teach a child who is obsessed with a particular toy communication and problem solving skills in the following way: Hide the toy in one of your hands and get the child to reach for it and choose which hand it is in. Then you can do the same thing by holding the toy behind your back, or placing it near your face to establish eye contact. Subsequent steps may include getting the child to make sounds or use speech if possible to request the toy. The toy is used as a reward. This example is based on one in Engaging Autism by Dr. Stanley Greenspan.
For the rest of the FAQs on my website, see www.coachmike.net.
Lately, it seems that RDI has taken off as the method of choice. I can’t really see how RDI is much different than DIR, except maybe that the order of the letters sounds a little bit more catchy. If anything, RDI seems like an implementation of DIR. However, this summary from Chicago Floortime Families points out some differences as well as many similarities.
According to about.com (I went there because the RDI website at http://www.rdiconnect.com/ doesn’t do a good job of describing RDI), children can develop the following through RDI:
- Dramatic improvement in meaningful communication,
- Desire and skills to share their experiences with others,
- Genuine curiosity and enthusiasm for other people,
- Ability to adapt easily and “go with the flow,”
- Amazing increase in the initiation of joint attention,
- Powerful improvement in perspective taking and theory of mind,
- Dramatically increased desire to seek out and interact with peers.
This looks a lot like DIR to me. In any case, whether it’s DIR, RDI, or you want to create a new acronym such as IRD or IDR, the goals of each system are the same.